From 1ce7455841f37da9759683d246f7af1f9a5baec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rose Liverman Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:06:25 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Update lk-99-sources.md --- metadata/lk-99-sources.md | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/metadata/lk-99-sources.md b/metadata/lk-99-sources.md index 64993de..48ec58d 100644 --- a/metadata/lk-99-sources.md +++ b/metadata/lk-99-sources.md @@ -9,23 +9,23 @@ in my video's description, so I moved all source information elsewhere to avoid happening again. This will be how I publish videos from now on. Sources (appearing directly in this video, in order): -- First paper (room temperature superconductor): https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008v1 -- Second paper (quantum levitation): https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037v1 -- Mistakes happen all the time: https://davidseaman.substack.com/p/lk-99-team-in-china-sees-partial -- First video! https://sciencecast.org/casts/suc384jly50n -- Inconsistency quote: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/viral-new-superconductivity-claims-leave-many-scientists-skeptical/ -- Hacker News conversations from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624 -- First replication efforts: https://elsazhou.medium.com/lk99-chinese-replication-efforts-a21318e4a71 -- Second replication video: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14p4y1V7kS/ -- Comment about second video: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202308/1295553.shtml -- It's hard to make LK-99: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/lawrence-berkeley-lab-simulations-support-lk-99-superconductor.html -- Third video: https://twitter.com/floates0x/status/1686394749056634880 -- Superconductors are most certainly not a panacea: https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684071807966650370 +- First paper (room temperature superconductor): [https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008v1) +- Second paper (quantum levitation): [https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037v1) +- Mistakes happen all the time: [https://davidseaman.substack.com/p/lk-99-team-in-china-sees-partial](https://davidseaman.substack.com/p/lk-99-team-in-china-sees-partial) +- First video! [https://sciencecast.org/casts/suc384jly50n](https://sciencecast.org/casts/suc384jly50n) +- Inconsistency quote: [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/viral-new-superconductivity-claims-leave-many-scientists-skeptical/](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/viral-new-superconductivity-claims-leave-many-scientists-skeptical/) +- Hacker News conversations from [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624) +- First replication efforts: [https://elsazhou.medium.com/lk99-chinese-replication-efforts-a21318e4a71](https://elsazhou.medium.com/lk99-chinese-replication-efforts-a21318e4a71) +- Second replication video: [https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14p4y1V7kS/](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14p4y1V7kS/) +- Comment about second video: [https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202308/1295553.shtml](https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202308/1295553.shtml) +- It's hard to make LK-99: [https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/lawrence-berkeley-lab-simulations-support-lk-99-superconductor.html](https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/lawrence-berkeley-lab-simulations-support-lk-99-superconductor.html) +- Third video: [https://twitter.com/floates0x/status/1686394749056634880](https://twitter.com/floates0x/status/1686394749056634880) +- Superconductors are most certainly not a panacea: [https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684071807966650370](https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684071807966650370) Sources (not in video, but providing important context!): -- Learn about diamagnetism you cretin! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism -- Paper showing LK-99 superconductivity is possible: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16892v1 -- NY Times interviews author of that paper: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/03/science/lk-99-superconductor-ambient.html +- Learn about diamagnetism you cretin! [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism) +- Paper showing LK-99 superconductivity is possible: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16892v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16892v1) +- NY Times interviews author of that paper: [https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/03/science/lk-99-superconductor-ambient.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/03/science/lk-99-superconductor-ambient.html) There are many more sources to read that are important. There is also conflicting information abound. I have lost some of the sources I wished to link here.