Update lk-99-sources.md

This commit is contained in:
2024-12-20 12:06:25 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent beafca4448
commit 1ce7455841
+15 -15
View File
@@ -9,23 +9,23 @@ in my video's description, so I moved all source information elsewhere to avoid
happening again. This will be how I publish videos from now on. happening again. This will be how I publish videos from now on.
Sources (appearing directly in this video, in order): Sources (appearing directly in this video, in order):
- First paper (room temperature superconductor): https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008v1 - First paper (room temperature superconductor): [https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008v1)
- Second paper (quantum levitation): https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037v1 - Second paper (quantum levitation): [https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037v1)
- Mistakes happen all the time: https://davidseaman.substack.com/p/lk-99-team-in-china-sees-partial - Mistakes happen all the time: [https://davidseaman.substack.com/p/lk-99-team-in-china-sees-partial](https://davidseaman.substack.com/p/lk-99-team-in-china-sees-partial)
- First video! https://sciencecast.org/casts/suc384jly50n - First video! [https://sciencecast.org/casts/suc384jly50n](https://sciencecast.org/casts/suc384jly50n)
- Inconsistency quote: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/viral-new-superconductivity-claims-leave-many-scientists-skeptical/ - Inconsistency quote: [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/viral-new-superconductivity-claims-leave-many-scientists-skeptical/](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/viral-new-superconductivity-claims-leave-many-scientists-skeptical/)
- Hacker News conversations from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624 - Hacker News conversations from [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624)
- First replication efforts: https://elsazhou.medium.com/lk99-chinese-replication-efforts-a21318e4a71 - First replication efforts: [https://elsazhou.medium.com/lk99-chinese-replication-efforts-a21318e4a71](https://elsazhou.medium.com/lk99-chinese-replication-efforts-a21318e4a71)
- Second replication video: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14p4y1V7kS/ - Second replication video: [https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14p4y1V7kS/](https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14p4y1V7kS/)
- Comment about second video: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202308/1295553.shtml - Comment about second video: [https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202308/1295553.shtml](https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202308/1295553.shtml)
- It's hard to make LK-99: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/lawrence-berkeley-lab-simulations-support-lk-99-superconductor.html - It's hard to make LK-99: [https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/lawrence-berkeley-lab-simulations-support-lk-99-superconductor.html](https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/07/lawrence-berkeley-lab-simulations-support-lk-99-superconductor.html)
- Third video: https://twitter.com/floates0x/status/1686394749056634880 - Third video: [https://twitter.com/floates0x/status/1686394749056634880](https://twitter.com/floates0x/status/1686394749056634880)
- Superconductors are most certainly not a panacea: https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684071807966650370 - Superconductors are most certainly not a panacea: [https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684071807966650370](https://twitter.com/drjolatunji/status/1684071807966650370)
Sources (not in video, but providing important context!): Sources (not in video, but providing important context!):
- Learn about diamagnetism you cretin! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism - Learn about diamagnetism you cretin! [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism)
- Paper showing LK-99 superconductivity is possible: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16892v1 - Paper showing LK-99 superconductivity is possible: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16892v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16892v1)
- NY Times interviews author of that paper: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/03/science/lk-99-superconductor-ambient.html - NY Times interviews author of that paper: [https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/03/science/lk-99-superconductor-ambient.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/03/science/lk-99-superconductor-ambient.html)
There are many more sources to read that are important. There is also conflicting information abound. There are many more sources to read that are important. There is also conflicting information abound.
I have lost some of the sources I wished to link here. I have lost some of the sources I wished to link here.